Legal Opinion

DeYoung v. State Land Office Board

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 9, 1946No. Calendar No. 43,371PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBushnell, J.

Plaintiff Wilbur DeYoung seeks a writ of mandamus in this court to require defendant State land office board to forthwith accept payments due under a land contract in which he is the vendee’s assignee and defendant is the vendor. This contract, which is dated January 21, 1941, was assigned to DeYoung on November 17, 1941. According to the admissions in DeYoung’s petition, “notices of intention to' forfeit” on 5 or 6 different occasions were served upon him. In each instance he redeemed the arrearages.

On April 27, 1945, a “notice of intention to forfeit” was sent him by registered mail, he…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Teasel v. Department of Mental HealthMichigan Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Pillon v. Attorney GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Iron County Board of Supervisors v. City of Crystal FallsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
  4. Nash v. State Land Office BoardMichigan Supreme Court · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API