Hamilton-Brown Shoe Co. v. Mercer
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Des Moines District Court. — Hon. J. M. Casey, Judge. Action 'upon an account, aided by an attachment. There was a judgment for the plaintiff, and the inter-venor appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtGranger, J.
It is urged that the assignments of error are not sufficiently specific to justify their 1. General assignment: fraud: collateral attack. consideration. As to some of them, the objection is well taken; but as to an instruction refused, and alone to be considered, we think the assignment sufficient.
II. Catherine Byrne is the defendant in this action, against whom the plaintiff company brought the action 2. Attachment: validity: priority of liens. on ari account for six hundred and forty-seven dollars and seventy cents, aiding the proceeding by an attachment on different grounds under the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Covell v. HeymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Freeman v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1861
- Krippendorf v. HydeSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Burrows v. LehndorffSupreme Court of Iowa · 1859
3Cited by14 opinions
- Des Moines National Bank v. BatesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1929
- Smith v. Sioux City Nursery & Seed Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1899
- In re Assignment of WiseSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
- Mehlhop v. EllsworthSupreme Court of Iowa · 1895
- Mahaska County State Bank v. BrownSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.