Smith v. Sioux City Nursery & Seed Co.
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Wol'dbury 'íiisÉrict' Hów. ^eastic E.. ,- ■<>r:A-.GrAyíí(0'R,.'tXllclge,/,. iyy,y m yj/,^ *mi!’••urti-it'* 'W 'W1 !wtp /i ff*’^ <■»;** 4A .Vkipí; v^omO®'*>lM9,5ír,6Ji.jlf8í),6,'',two sto®fch©ld'e»S',<>>f,:fr}i©i'S,i«0ity 2íRi%eiy:&'S0ed: ©BlíipáMy1 áppli'é'd:ifo¥"fli‘é kjíp'ó'iiitÍR&ñ'^óí a f§"¿eiver•tíiexeior.’,’r tfliat"nígKt"i£& }§iopx3faSmár^aaí^and oiJ3,piBi@ieiditQr^,.sii@d(,®ptn'wri't'S>!0f,attechri3jeHty.RiMlfiOa'US8dr:tiEem tcn-Rg, déívred'^W'á…
Read the full summary
Appeal from Wol'dbury 'íiisÉrict' Hów. ^eastic E.. ,- ■<>r:A-.GrAyíí(0'R,.'tXllclge,/,. iyy,y m yj/,^ *mi!’••urti-it'* 'W 'W1 !wtp /i ff*’^ <■»;** 4A .Vkipí; v^omO®'*>lM9,5ír,6Ji.jlf8í),6,'',two sto®fch©ld'e»S',<>>f,:fr}i©i'S,i«0ity 2íRi%eiy:&'S0ed: ©BlíipáMy1 áppli'é'd:ifo¥"fli‘é kjíp'ó'iiitÍR&ñ'^óí a f§"¿eiver•tíiexeior.’,’r tfliat"nígKt"i£& }§iopx3faSmár^aaí^and oiJ3,piBi@ieiditQr^,.sii@d(,®ptn'wri't'S>!0f,attechri3jeHty.RiMlfiOa'US8dr:tiEem tcn-Rg, déívred'^W'á ]p0ítí8'ñ'"óf' ítS"p'r8|jéf1%' ‘áHd “tHe'r6f)m-m,n,n b’riowj vni'* .♦ni1.'* ‘irT.’wln’nflCB ’i'toi'h tivw c .'bl'i W>v* tcJlirfy…
1Opinion of the CourtLadd, J.
The appellants are not in a situation to attack the proceedings in which the receiver was appointed, the attachments sued out, and the assignments of accounts as fraudulent, either when taken together as constituting a general 2 assignment with preferences or when separately considered. They have not recovered judgment their claims, and have no liens whatever on the property, nor interest therein, other than that every creditor has in the estate of his debtor. That a third party, who has not reduced his claim to judgment, and has no interest in or lien on the property affected, cannot…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Late Corp. of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Kneeland v. American Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Wiswall v. SampsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1853
- Walling v. . MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
- Van Alstyne v. . CookNew York Court of Appeals · 1862
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Lawson v. WarrenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- American Clay MacHinery Co. v. New England Brick Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1913
- Brenton Bros. v. DorrSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931
- Cooper v. EricksonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931
- Ringen Stove Co. v. BowersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.