Legal Opinion
Turner v. Wells
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided June 29, 1937No. 27809Published
1Per curiam
The plaintiff in error attempts to 'appeal from an order overruling motion for new trial on September 26, 1936. An examination of the record discloses that the order overruling motion for new trial is not in the record. In Lillard v. Meisberger, 113 Okla. 228, 240 P. 1067. we said:
“Where the record does not contain an order of the court overruling a motion for new trial, a mere recital (in the case-made) that the motion for new trial was in fact overruled, and exceptions allowed, is insufficient, in the absence of such order, and there is nothing properly before this court for review.”
To the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Lillard v. MeisbergerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- City of Tulsa v. KaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
- Morris v. CaulkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Harner v. BeeseSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936