Northwestern Redwood Co. v. Industrial Accident Commission
California Supreme Court
PROCEEDING on Certiorari to review an award of the Industrial Accident Commission. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. R. P. Wisecarver and Redman & Alexander for Petitioners.
1Opinion of the CourtWilbur, J.
Petitioner seek to review and annul an award of the respondent commission, which was made because of an accident suffered hy Jack Schaefer, husband of respondent Mary Schaefer, February 14, 1918, while he was employed hy the Northwestern Redwood Company, resulting in the amputation of one finger and the crippling of the other fingers of the hand. No question is raised as to the amount or as to the obligation to make compensation for said injuries under the workmen’s compensation law. The contention of the petitioners is that the award could not properly be made upon the petition of the wife.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Western Metal Supply Co. v. PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
3Cited by13 opinions
- In Re Marriage of JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Bianco v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Williams v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1921
- Dawson v. McNaneyArizona Supreme Court · 1950
- In Re Marriage of McDonaldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.