Legal Opinion
BARON BROTHERS COMPANY v. Stewart
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 4, 1960PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DIMOCK, District Judge.
Defendant Rapid-American Corporation, hereinafter Rapid-American, moves for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and, in the alternative, for an order granting leave to file a counterclaim against plaintiffs, Baron Brothers Company, hereinafter Baron Brothers, and a cross-claim against defendants Stewart and Smith. The counterclaim and cross-claim are intended to begin an interpleader action against plaintiffs Baron Brothers, on the one hand, and defendants Stewart and Smith, on the other, as claimants against defendant Rapid-American. Rapid-American moves also for…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Dioguardi v. DurningCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- E. C. Robinson Lumber Co. v. FortDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1953
- Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. United Electrical Radio & MacHine Workers of AmericaDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1951
3Cited by6 opinions
- Stuyvesant Insurance Co. v. Dean Construction Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1966
- Hogg v. WalkerSupreme Court of Delaware · 1993
- Francis I. Du Pont & Co., a Partnership Composed of Edmond Du Pont, in Interpleader and v. Al B. Sheen and John F. ConnellyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1963
- Bankers Trust Co. of Western New York v. CrawfordDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1983
- Capital Investors Co. v. Executors of the Estate of MorrisonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.