E. C. Robinson Lumber Co. v. Fort
District Court, E.D. Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
HULEN, District Judge.
We have for ruling defendant Mary K. Fort’s motion to remand, based on lack of jurisdiction. The motion presents two questions: first, whether a garnishment proceeding in aid of execution may be removed from the State court because of diversity of citizenship between the garnishor and garnishee, where the garnishee initially contested his liability under an insurance policy; second, whether this Court has jurisdiction of an interpleader action where there is diversity of citizenship between the claimants and the stakeholder, but not between the claimants. We hold that…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Treinies v. Sunshine Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Hunter v. Federal Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940
- Stoll v. Hawkeye Casualty Co. Of Des Moines, IowaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1950
- Brucker v. Georgia Casualty Co.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1926
- United Fuel Gas Co. v. DyerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1950
3Cited by7 opinions
- Susie Randolph v. Employers Mutual Liability Insurance Company of Wisconsin GarnisheeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1958
- Consolidated Underwriters of South Carolina Insurance v. BradshawDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1955
- Williams v. WilliamsDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1976
- JEFFERSON STANDARD LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. SmithDistrict Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1956
- BARON BROTHERS COMPANY v. StewartDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1960
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.