Legal Opinion

State v. Anderson

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided June 8, 1989No. 8967-3-IIIPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShields, J.

Ralph L. Sharkey was charged with carrying a loaded pistol in a vehicle without a license, RCW 9.41-.050(3). At a pretrial hearing, Mr. Sharkey contended the State was required to prove knowledge that the pistol was loaded as an element of the crime. In the alternative, Mr. Sharkey asserted he was entitled to present an affirmative defense he did not know the gun was loaded. The trial court ruled "[t]he crimes defined by RCW 9.41.050 do not require the proof of guilty knowledge.” The sole issue on appeal is whether the court erred in this ruling. We affirm.

On June 30, 1987, while transporting…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. United States v. BalintSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  3. State v. CleppeWashington Supreme Court · 1981
  4. State v. StrohWashington Supreme Court · 1979
  5. State v. KnappCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1989

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. QuinnMichigan Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State v. ThierryCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1991
  3. People v. QuinnMichigan Supreme Court · 1992
  4. State of Washington v. Glen Howard PinkhamCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API