Legal Opinion

Phelps v. Chicago & West Michigan Railway Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 12, 1899PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error to Grand Traverse; Corbett, J. Case by George W. Phelps against the Chicago & West Michigan Railway Company for personal injuries. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.

Plaintiff was a brakeman in the employ of the defendant .company. For two years prior to the accident complained of, he had been employed by the defendant as a yard-master in its yards at Traverse City; but on Friday preceding April 27, 1896, he had been transferred ' from that work to brake on a freight train running from Traverse City to Petoskey and Bay View. At Petoskey the defendant’s road is' located near to, and conforms to, the bay. On the northerly side of the track, and about 40 ' feet from it, was located'a fish-house, for the storage and *172packing of fish. Leading from the platform…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Gibson v. . Erie Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1875
  2. Lovejoy v. Boston & Lowell RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878
  3. Ragon v. Toledo, Ann Arbor & North Michigan Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Illick v. Flint & Pere Marquette RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Goodes v. Boston & Albany RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1894

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Bauer v. American Car & Foundry Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Clay v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
  3. Boylen v. Berkey & Gay Furniture Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Kenney v. MeddaughCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1902
  5. Cristanelli v. Saginaw Mining Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1908

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API