Legal Opinion

Seay v. Bank of Rome

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 15, 1881PublishedCited by 31 opinions

Banks. Constitutional law. Liens. State depositories. Debtor and creditor. Before Judge UNDERWOOD. Floyd County. At Chambers. April 9th, 1881. Reported in the decision.

1Opinion of the Court

Crisp, Judge.

On the eleventh day of November, 1879, the governor' of this state, under and by virtue of the act of the genral assembly approved October 16th, 1879, appointed the Bank of Rome, a corporation doing business in the city of Rome, in this state, a depository. On the fifteenth day of November thereafter, said corporation made and executed the bond required by law. During the year 1880, the treasurer of this state deposited in said bank of the funds of the state the sum of $25,500.80, and the tax collectors of the various counties designated by the governor deposited with said bank…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Robinson v. Bank of DarienSupreme Court of Georgia · 1855
  2. Bibb County Loan Ass'n v. RichardsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1857
  3. Doe ex dem. Gledney v. DeavorsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1850
  4. Dobbins v. WaltonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1868
  5. McCallie & Jones v. WaltonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1868

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Lewis v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Md.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. United States F. & G. Co. v. BramwellOregon Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Booth v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
  4. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. RaineyTennessee Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Aetna Accident & Liability Co. v. MillerMontana Supreme Court · 1918

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API