Legal Opinion
Silverado Communication Corp. v. Public Utilities Commission
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided April 24, 1995No. 94SA206PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Mullarkey
Plaintiff-appellant Silverado Communications Corporation (Silverado), appeals from the Denver District Court holding that defendant-appellee U S West Communications, Inc. (US West) did not engage in retroactive ratemaking and was entitled to shift Silvera-do’s service from a “semi-public” business trunk service (PBX trunks) to its Public Access Line (PAL) tariff. Silverado challenges the applicability of the PAL tariff from October 1991 to February 1993. We affirm the holding of the district court.
I
The Public Utilities Commission (PUC) regulates Silverado as a provider of computer-based…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- City of Montrose v. PUBLIC UTILITIES COM'N, ETC.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1981
- Strickland Transportation Company, Inc. v. United States of America, T.I.M.E. Freight, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964
- Peoples Natural Gas Division of Northern Natural Gas Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1979
- Integrated Network Services, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
- Colorado Energy Advocacy Office v. Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1985
3Cited by8 opinions
- AviComm, Inc. v. Colorado Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998
- Trans Shuttle, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 2004
- Powell v. Colorado Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998
- Boulder Airporter, Inc. v. Rocky Mountain Shuttlines, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1996
- Mile High Cab, Inc. v. Colorado Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 2013
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.