Legal Opinion
Boulder Airporter, Inc. v. Rocky Mountain Shuttlines, Inc.
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided July 1, 1996No. 95SA186PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scott
Petitioners Boulder Airporter, Inc., and American Limousine Service, Inc., (collectively “Airporter”) 1 seek review of the district court judgment affirming respondent Public Utilities Commission’s (PUC) decision to grant respondent Rocky Mountain Shutt-lines, Inc., (Shuttlines) a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity (certificate). We affirm the district court’s judgment.
I
On November 17, 1992, Shuttlines filed applications with the PUC for temporary and permanent authority to operate a eall- and-demand, door-to-door limousine service from Boulder County to the Denver airport. 2…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Public Utilities Commission v. District CourtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1967
- Donahue v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1961
- Ephraim Freightways, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1963
- Integrated Network Services, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
- Red Ball Motor Freight, Inc. v. Public Utilities Commission of StateSupreme Court of Colorado · 1974
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Trans Shuttle, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 2004
- Phoenix Power Partners, L.P. v. Colorado Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998
- Public Service Co. v. Trigen-Nations Energy Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1999
- City of Boulder v. Colorado Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
- Durango Transportation, Inc. v. Colorado Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.