Legal Opinion

Mile High Cab, Inc. v. Colorado Public Utilities Commission

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 22, 2013No. Supreme Court Case No. 11SA312PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Coats

1 1 Mile High Cab appealed directly to this court, pursuant to section 40-6-115(5), C.R.S. (2012), from the judgment of the district court affirming the denial of its application for a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity. After a lengthy hearing, which included expert testimony both for and against the application, the administrative law judge to whom the application had been assigned issued a recommended decision, finding that the several incumbent carriers opposing the application had adequately proved that public convenience and necessity did not require granting the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Strickler v. GreeneSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. Speiser v. RandallSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  5. Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., County of RiversideSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. City of Littleton v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeSupreme Court of Colorado · 2016
  2. City of Littleton v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeSupreme Court of Colorado · 2016
  3. Peo v. MarxColorado Court of Appeals · 2019
  4. People v. d'EstreeColorado Court of Appeals · 2024
  5. Pinnacol Assurance v. HoffSupreme Court of Colorado · 2016

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API