Legal Opinion

White v. State

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided July 18, 2007No. 4277PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.

On July 5, 2005, the State commenced an action pursuant to the South Carolina Sexually Violent Predator Act (the Act), 1 alleging Kenneth White (White) met the statutory criteria for confinement as a sexually violent predator. Based on the Act, the State sought White’s commitment in a secure facility for long-term care, control, and treatment. The circuit court found no probable cause existed to establish White was a sexually violent predator and accordingly dismissed the action. We reverse and remand.

FACTS

White has a long history of sexually violent behavior toward women. In July 2002, White…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hodges v. RaineySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  2. In Re the Care & Treatment of HaySupreme Court of Kansas · 1998
  3. In Re the Care & Treatment of MatthewsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
  4. Burns v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
  5. Higgins v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. South Carolina Coastal Conservation League v. South Carolina Department of Health & Environmental ControlCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008
  2. In Re the Care & Treatment of ManigoCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2010
  3. Care and Treatment of Chandler v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2009
  4. In re the Care & Treatment of ManigoSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2012
  5. CARE AND TREATMENT OF ETTEL v. StateCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API