White v. State
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.
On July 5, 2005, the State commenced an action pursuant to the South Carolina Sexually Violent Predator Act (the Act), 1 alleging Kenneth White (White) met the statutory criteria for confinement as a sexually violent predator. Based on the Act, the State sought White’s commitment in a secure facility for long-term care, control, and treatment. The circuit court found no probable cause existed to establish White was a sexually violent predator and accordingly dismissed the action. We reverse and remand.
FACTS
White has a long history of sexually violent behavior toward women. In July 2002, White…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hodges v. RaineySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
- In Re the Care & Treatment of HaySupreme Court of Kansas · 1998
- In Re the Care & Treatment of MatthewsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
- Burns v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
- Higgins v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- South Carolina Coastal Conservation League v. South Carolina Department of Health & Environmental ControlCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008
- In Re the Care & Treatment of ManigoCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2010
- Care and Treatment of Chandler v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2009
- In re the Care & Treatment of ManigoSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2012
- CARE AND TREATMENT OF ETTEL v. StateCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.