Legal Opinion
First Nat. Bank of St. Petersburg v. City of Miami
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided March 1, 1934No. 6795PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HUTCHESON, Circuit Judge.
This is a suit to charge moneys of a failed bank which has passed into a receiver’s hands, with a trust for the amount of a collection item on itself-sent to the bank for collection and remittance.
When it was here before on the city’s appeal from a decree dismissing the bill on motion, we thought the allegations of the bill sufficient, if proved, 1 and we sent the cause back to be tiied on the merits. City of Miami v. First National Bank of St. Petersburg (C. C. A.) 58 F. (2d) 561. It lias now been tried on that bill.
In defendants’ answer the drawing, the sending, and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Schuyler v. LittlefieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- National Bank v. BurkhardtSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- American Nat. Bank of Nashville v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Commercial National Bank v. Canal-Louisiana Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Hecker-Jones-Jewell Milling Co. v. Cosmopolitan Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Wisdom v. KeenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1934
- Converse Rubber Co. v. Boston-Continental Nat. BankDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1935
- Atlantic Gypsum Co. v. Federal Nat. Bank of BostonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1935
- Brownell v. TurmanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1935
- Johnson v. First Nat. Bank & Trust Co.District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1934
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.