Legal Opinion

Johnson v. First Nat. Bank & Trust Co.

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma

Decided November 13, 1934No. 1956PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRANKLIN E. KENNAMER, District Judge.

At the time it closed its doors the Shawnee National Bank had a deposit with defendant, the amount of which is undisputed. The question presented is whether defendant is entitled to an offset of $2,216.89, the sum of two checks payable to defendant’s order, drawn on the Shawnee Bank, mailed to that bank by defendant and by the drawee marked “paid” and charged to the accounts of the drawers, and for which no remittance was made to defendant. The drawers had deposits with the Shawnee Bank in amounts sufficient to cover these checks.

Of these checks, one was…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Burton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  2. Commercial Bank of Pa. v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  3. City of Douglas v. Federal Reserve Bank of DallasSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  4. Dakin v. BaylySupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  5. Larabee Flour Mills v. First Nat. Bank of HenryettaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ogdin v. GoodwinCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1935
  2. Campbell v. Noble-Trotter Rice Milling Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1938
  3. Ex Parte Calcasieu-Marine Nat'l BankSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API