Legal Opinion
Fisher v. Golden Valley Elec. Ass'n, Inc.
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided January 28, 1983No. 5902PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MATTHEWS, Justice.
The question on the merits in this case is whether a utility may construct a powerline on an unused section line easement reserved for highway purposes under AS 19.10.010. 1 The superior court answered this question in the affirmative. We agree and affirm.
I
We first address the issue of whether the appellants have standing to maintain this appeal. They were named plaintiffs together with James and Barbara Heider. In Count I of the complaint all the plaintiffs as members of the utility claimed that they had been damaged by the utility’s alleged unlawful failure to…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Gurnsey v. Northern California Power Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
- United States v. Oklahoma Gas & Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Louisiana Power & Light Company v. DileoLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1955
- Girves v. Kenai Peninsula BoroughAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
- Potomac Edison Co. v. RoutzahnCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1949
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Keokuk Junction Railway Co. v. IES Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2000
- Paul G. Shultz v. Department of Army, United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Box L Corp. v. Teton County ex rel. Board of County CommissionersWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. HomarWyoming Supreme Court · 1990
- Nerbonne v. Florida Power Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.