Legal Opinion

Paul G. Shultz v. Department of Army, United States of America

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 30, 1993No. 92-35197, 92-35580PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FLETCHER, Circuit Judge:

Paul G. Shultz appeals the district court’s judgment in favor of the government in his action to quiet title under 28 U.S.C. § 2409a to a public light (or rights) of way across Fort Wainwright. He argues that the district court erred in finding that no rights of way existed within the meaning of 43 U.S.C. § 932 (“RS 2477 rights of way”), 1 or that, if they did exist, his cause of action, nonetheless, was barred under 28 U.S.C. § 2409a(g) (the statute of limitations for quiet title actions). In the alternative, Shultz contends that even if no RS 2477 right of way…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. United States v. Hector Martin RamosCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  4. Sierra Club v. HodelCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
  5. United States v. Oklahoma Gas & Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance v. Bureau of Land ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
  2. Michel v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  3. Hoefler v. BabbittCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  4. Fitzgerald v. PuddicombeAlaska Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Mafrige v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1995

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API