Paul G. Shultz v. Department of Army, United States of America
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FLETCHER, Circuit Judge:
Paul G. Shultz appeals the district court’s judgment in favor of the government in his action to quiet title under 28 U.S.C. § 2409a to a public light (or rights) of way across Fort Wainwright. He argues that the district court erred in finding that no rights of way existed within the meaning of 43 U.S.C. § 932 (“RS 2477 rights of way”), 1 or that, if they did exist, his cause of action, nonetheless, was barred under 28 U.S.C. § 2409a(g) (the statute of limitations for quiet title actions). In the alternative, Shultz contends that even if no RS 2477 right of way…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. Hector Martin RamosCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Sierra Club v. HodelCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- United States v. Oklahoma Gas & Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance v. Bureau of Land ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- Michel v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Hoefler v. BabbittCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Fitzgerald v. PuddicombeAlaska Supreme Court · 1996
- Mafrige v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1995
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.