Legal Opinion

Mann v. Tyler

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 6, 1885PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error to Wayne. (Speed, J.) Assumpsit. Plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtCooLur, C. J.

Plaintiff sued defendant in justice’s court ■on a promissory note. The evidence given by him on the trial was that the note was given in renewal of a prior note, which prior note was for a balance due on a piano purchase. The defendant relied upon set-offs ; but these set-offs, as they were testified to by him, consisted of payments on the same purchase, made before the giving of the first note. According to the justice’s return, he was asked on cross-examination whether all these payments were not allowed him when the first note was given, and he replied that they were talked ■over. The…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. HobsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Howell v. ShepardMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Whitbeck v. Common CouncilMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Ritter v. DanielsMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Rawson v. McElvaineMichigan Supreme Court · 1882

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Sholund v. Mayor & Common CouncilSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  2. McGurrin v. Grand Rapids Township BoardMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Henika v. BrownMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Moore v. FrederickMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Foster v. WatsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1908

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API