Legal Opinion

Klamath Irrigation District v. Employment Division

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 14, 1975PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LANGrTRY, p. j.

This appeal, pursuant to ORS 657.684, of a referee’s findings, conclusions and order presents the question whether an irrigation district existing under Oregon law and delivering over 96 percent of the water it handles for farming purposes is exempt from paying unemployment compensation taxes for the benefit of its employes. ORS 657.020(1) of the unemployment compensation Act was amended in 1973 to provide that political subdivisions are subject to *63paying the tax. Irrigation districts are admittedly political subdivisions. However, the same legislative session re-enacted…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Better Business Bureau of Washington, D. C., Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Multnomah School of Bible v. Multnomah CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Singer Sewing MacHine Co. v. State Unemployment Compensation CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Hatchery v. Iowa Employment Security CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1948
  5. Puget Sound Bridge & Dredging Co. v. State Unemployment Compensation CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1942

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Naumes of Oregon, Inc. v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
  2. Talent Irrigation District v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
  3. Rogue River Valley Irrigation District v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
  4. Rogue River Valley Irrigation District v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
  5. Talent Irrigation District v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API