Legal Opinion
Heath v. Spitzmiller
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided December 16, 1983No. 13018, 13019PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PREWITT, Judge.
The parties are certified public accountants who practiced public accounting as a partnership known as “Spitzmiller, Hobbs, Clay, Berry & Heath”. The petition and counterclaims involve the rights and obligations of the parties arising out of the formation, dissolution and termination of that partnership. Following nonjury trial all parties appealed from the trial court’s determination.
The parties prepared, apparently without the aid of legal counsel, a “Partnership Agreement”. It was signed on June 28, 1978, and provided that they were forming a partnership “for the purpose of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Grissum v. ReesmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1974
- Stein v. JungMissouri Court of Appeals · 1973
- Stuart v. Overland Medical CenterMissouri Court of Appeals · 1974
- Hahn v. Forest Hills Construction CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1960
- Pointer v. WardSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Moore v. SeabaughMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
- Husch & Eppenberger, LLC v. EisenbergMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
- National Advertising Co. v. HeroldMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
- McRentals, Inc. v. BarberMissouri Court of Appeals · 2001
- Tropeano v. DormanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.