Lanier v. Foust and Douglass
Texas Supreme Court
3. Findings of Fact — Practice.—The omission of the court to find upon a material matter when its attention was not called to such omission is no ground for reversal. The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
GAINES, Associate Justice.
Appellee Douglass, on the 5th day of December, 1883, sold to one Wilson a tract of land consisting of seventy-nine acres for $50 in cash and $400 on a credit, for which the vendee executed his three promissory notes, two for $100 each and one for $200, payable one, two, and three years after date respectively. Douglass executed a deed to Wilson for the land, but expressly reserved in the conveyance a lien upon it to secure the payment of the unpaid purchase money. Wilson not being able to pay the first note when it fell due, Douglass agreed to extend the time for its…
2Cited by66 opinions
- Binford v. SnyderTexas Supreme Court · 1945
- Chase v. SwayneTexas Supreme Court · 1895
- Stewart v. United States Leasing Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1985
- Jones v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912
- Pitts v. Camp CountyTexas Supreme Court · 1931
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.