Legal Opinion

State v. Ware

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 8, 1916PublishedCited by 20 opinions

From Multnomah: Henry E. McGinn, Judge. Statement by Mr. Justice Benson. The defendant, E. E. Ware, was convicted of violating the provisions of Chapter 278 of the Laws of 1913. The charging part of the indictment reads as follows: “The said E. E. Ware, J. J. Wiesen, O. O. Grovier and J. Richards, on the 14th day of July, A. D. 1914, in the county of Multnomah and State of Oregon, then and there being, did then and there unlawfully, knowingly and willfully engage in the…

Read the full summary

From Multnomah: Henry E. McGinn, Judge. Statement by Mr. Justice Benson. The defendant, E. E. Ware, was convicted of violating the provisions of Chapter 278 of the Laws of 1913. The charging part of the indictment reads as follows: “The said E. E. Ware, J. J. Wiesen, O. O. Grovier and J. Richards, on the 14th day of July, A. D. 1914, in the county of Multnomah and State of Oregon, then and there being, did then and there unlawfully, knowingly and willfully engage in the business of making loans of money and of personal credit upon which the said defendants did then and there directly and…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Benson

1. The assignments of error are numerous; the first, third, seventh and ninth being chiefly directed to the contention that the act under which the prosecution is maintained is unconstitutional and void. This contention is first raised in the demurrer to the indictment. *370The statute in controversy contains, inter alia, the following clause:

“No license shall be granted to any such person, firm or voluntary association unless said person and the members of any such firm or voluntary association shall be bona fide residents of the State of Oregon, and no license shall be issued to any joint stock…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Steamship Co. v. JoliffeSupreme Court of the United States · 1865
  2. Mutual Loan Co. v. MartellSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  3. State v. McDanielOregon Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Sandys v. WilliamsOregon Supreme Court · 1905
  5. State v. WilkinsOregon Supreme Court · 1914

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. LaundyOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  2. State v. FloranceOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  3. State v. FloresCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  4. Sekt v. Justice's CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  5. State v. McDanielOregon Supreme Court · 1924

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API