Legal Opinion

Price v. Kitsap Transit

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1994No. 60743-5Published

1Opinion of the Court

125 Wn.2d 456 (1994)

886 P.2d 556

CARL W. PRICE, ET AL, Respondents,

v.

KITSAP TRANSIT, Petitioner.

No. 60743-5.

The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

December 15, 1994.

Gierke, Curwen, Metzler & Erie, by Leigh D. Erie; Richard R. Stocking, for petitioner.

Randy W. Loun and Coons & Loun, for respondents.

Andrew G. Cooley on behalf of Washington Defense Trial Lawyers, amicus curiae for petitioner.

Bryan P. Harnetiaux and Gary N. Bloom on behalf of Washington State Trial Lawyers Association, amicus curiae for respondents.

UTTER, J.

Plaintiffs Carl Price and his wife brought suit against Defendant Kitsap…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Holland v. Boeing CompanyWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Washburn v. Beatt Equipment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Schmidt v. Cornerstone Investments, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Glover v. Tacoma General HospitalWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Price v. Kitsap TransitWashington Supreme Court · 1994

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API