Legal Opinion

Onorato Brothers, Inc. v. MASS. TURNPIKE AUTHORITY

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 8, 1957PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCutter, J.

The petitioner purchased in 1953 lots 61-67 and lot 80 in a section of Framingham. The respondent took (under St. 1952, c. 354) by eminent domain, by order dated March 24, 1955, part of lot 65 and the whole of lots 66, 67, and 80. Entry was made on March 30, 1955. Prior to the taking the petitioner had built speculative houses on lots 61-64, and after these houses were completed, the respondent put a number of stakes on these lots for the purpose of making surveys and plans. Thereafter, but prior to March 24, 1955, the holder of the mortgage on lots 61-64 foreclosed that mortgage.

The…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Barnes v. City of SpringfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  2. Chandler v. Jamaica Pond Aqueduct Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878
  3. Wine v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  4. Peirson v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
  5. Bailey v. Boston & Providence RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Heddin v. Delhi Gas Pipeline CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1975
  2. County of Kane v. Elmhurst National BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982
  3. Cleveland Bakers Union Local No. 19 Pension Fund v. StateOhio Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. Carlisle v. Department of Public UtilitiesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1968
  5. Parillo v. Director of Public WorksSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1973

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API