Legal Opinion
County of Kane v. Elmhurst National Bank
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided December 28, 1982No. 82-532, 82-651 consPublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PRESIDING JUSTICE SEIDENFELD
delivered the opinion of the court:
The County of Kane (County) filed complaints in the nature of equitable bills for discovery against the defendant landowners and thereafter filed a motion for “pre-pleading discovery.” It sought permission to enter the land of the defendants, Elmhurst National Bank, as trustee under Trust No. 3000, Frederick E. Haskins and Mary L. Haskins (the Owners) to conduct surveys, appraisals and subsoil tests preliminary to condemning the lands for highway construction purposes. The defendants filed motions to dismiss alleging that neither…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Hurley v. KincaidSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Litchfield v. . BondNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
- Steuart v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1855
- Indiana & Michigan Electric Co. v. StevensonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1977
- Jacobsen v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Town of Libertyville v. Bank of WaukeganAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987
- Property Reserve, Inc. v. Superior Court of San Joaquin CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
- Missouri Highway & Transportation Commission v. EilersMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
- Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. ChaulkNebraska Supreme Court · 2001
- Nat'l Compressed Steel Corp. v. Unified Gov't of Wyandotte County/Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 2002
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.