Legal Opinion

State v. Queen

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 9, 1918No. 21,369PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Sedgwick district court.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Mason, J.:

An information in the name of W. P. Montgomery, as assistant attorney-general of Sedgwick county, charging the maintenance of a nuisance under the prohibitory liquor law, was filed in the district court of that county. It charged that liquors and other property were used in maintaining such nuisance, and asked the seizure thereof. In accordance with the statute (Gen. Stat. 1915, § 5527) a warrant was issued directing the seizure of such property, as well .as the arrest of the persons charged with violating the law. Three persons were…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Mayes v. RuffnersWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1875
  2. One Cadillac Automobile v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  3. Mentor v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
  4. State v. HicksSupreme Court of Missouri · 1903
  5. Jackson v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 1867

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re the Estate of ReedSupreme Court of Kansas · 1981
  2. Chapman v. BoyntonDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1933
  3. State v. WilkinsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API