Legal Opinion

Riley v. Riley

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided March 31, 1921PublishedCited by 8 opinions

On application for money in court.

1Opinion of the Court

Walker, Chancellor.

This is a partition suit. The complainants are John Riley and Mary Aim, his wife, and the defendants are William Riley and Katie, his wife. The present proceeding is an application at the foot of the decree for a portion of the proceeds of the sale of the lands which were sought to be partitioned. The pertinent facts are these: James Riley, father of the complainant John Riley, *467and of the defendant William Riley, departed this life May 22d, 1893, intestate, seized in fee of a tract of land.in the borough of Wharton, and also of an equal undivided one-half part of a tract of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Evans v. VanbibberTennessee Supreme Court · 1850

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Kahn v. RockhillNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1942
  2. Reitmeier v. KalinoskiDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1986
  3. In Re Estate of RansomNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1965
  4. The Trenton Banking Co. v. HawleyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
  5. Cross v. FrenchNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1935

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API