Legal Opinion

Allayah Thomas, et al. v. Daniel Wayne Russel, et al.

District Court, D. Nevada

Decided February 20, 2026No. 3:24-cv-00357Unknown

1Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 * * * 4 ALLAYAH THOMAS, et al., Case No. 3:24-CV-00357-MMD-CLB 5 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO AMEND AND DENYING 6 v. PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO SEAL 7 DANIEL WAYNE RUSSEL, et al., [ECF Nos. 49, 50] 8 Defendants. 9 10 Before the Court is Plaintiff Allayah Thomas (“Thomas”) and Michael Denard’s 11 (“Denard”) (“collectively referred to as “Plaintiffs”) motion for leave to file a first amended 12 complaint (“FAC”).1 (ECF No. 49.) Also before the Court is Plaintiffs’ motion for leave to 13 file the FAC under seal.2 (ECF No. 50.)…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Eminence Capital, Llc, and Jay Spechler v. Aspeon, Inc. Richard P. StackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  3. Center for Auto Safety v. Chrysler Group, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  4. Dcd Programs, Ltd. v. Michael W. Leighton, Hill, Farrer & BurrillCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  5. Amerisourcebergen Corporation v. Dialysist West, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API