Legal Opinion

In Re Williams Estate

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided March 20, 1984No. 67519PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

133 Mich. App. 1 (1984)

349 N.W.2d 247

In re WILLIAMS ESTATE

SMITH

v.

WITHERSPOON

Docket No. 67519.

Michigan Court of Appeals.

Decided March 20, 1984.

Haines & Marti (by John A. Haines, Jr.), for petitioner.

Robert L. Kaczmarek, Prosecuting Attorney, and Terry L. Clark, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for respondent.

Before: J.H. GILLIS, P.J., and SHEPHERD and J.J. KELLEY,[*] JJ.

SHEPHERD, J.

Appellant, Lori Ann Smith, appeals from the Saginaw County Probate Court's denial of her petition for removal of respondent as guardian of the person and conservator of the estate of Ramon R. Williams, a legally…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. North v. JoslinMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  2. In re StockmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Stevens v. StevensMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
  4. In Re Wojan EstateMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Smith v. WitherspoonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. In Re BENNETT ESTATEMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. In re the Guardianship of SmithSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2010
  3. Redd v. Carney (In re Redd)Michigan Court of Appeals · 2017
  4. in Re Conservatorship of Rhea BrodyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2017
  5. In Re CONSERVATORSHIP OF BITTNERMichigan Court of Appeals · 2015

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API