Legal Opinion

Franco v. Bank of Forest Park

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 8, 1968No. 43707PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Eberhardt, Judge.

The record reflects that at the taking of Mr. Porter’s deposition for use in the trial Mr. Leiter, representing both defendants, asserted: “Yes, we stipulate that we got the notice to collect attorney’s fees.” Mr. Porter admitted it in his testimony and asserted that upon receiving the notice he called Mr. Franco and that Franco informed him that he had also received a similar letter.

There is no merit in the objection to the admission of the notice on the ground that it was not given after maturity of the obligation, as required under our ruling in Dailey v. First Nat. Bank…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Wilkins, Neely & Jones v. GibsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  2. One in All Corp. v. Fulton National BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
  3. Overcash v. First National BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
  4. Phelps v. Belle IsleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
  5. Simpson v. ChartersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. General Electric Credit Corp. v. BrooksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978
  2. Curtis v. First National Bank of CommerceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
  3. Kennedy v. Brand Banking Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
  4. Moore v. Wachovia Mortgage Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  5. Roberts v. FarmerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API