Legal Opinion

Overcash v. First National Bank

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 24, 1967No. 42587; 42601PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Feilton, Chief Judge.

The release of one surety shall discharge a co-surety. Code § 103-201. “Any change in the nature or terms of a contract is called a novation; such novation, without the consent of the surety, discharges him.” (Emphasis supplied.) Code § 103-202. Although the petition alleges that the novation was made with the knowledge and consent of defendants Haynie and Overcash, they contend that their consent must also be in writing, as a modification or amendment to the original agreement which, under the Statute of Frauds, was required to be in writing. Hawkins v. Studdard, 132 Ga.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hawkins v. StuddardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
  2. Printup v. MitchellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1855
  3. Gulf Oil Corporation v. WillcoxonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1955
  4. Jarman v. WestbrookSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
  5. James Employees Credit Union v. HawleyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Colodny v. Dominion Mortgage & Realty TrustCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
  2. Bonner v. Wachovia Mortgage Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
  3. Underwood v. Nationsbanc Real Estate Service, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
  4. Delta Diversified, Inc. v. Citizens & Southern National BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
  5. Franco v. Bank of Forest ParkCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API