Legal Opinion

In Re IBM Peripheral EDP Devices Antitrust Litigation

United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation

Decided April 21, 1976No. MDL No. 2952PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

Before JOHN MINOR WISDOM, Chairman, and EDWARD WEINFELD, EDWIN A. ROBSON, WILLIAM H. BECKER, JOSEPH S. LORD, III, STANLEY A. WEIG-EL, and ANDREW A. CAFFREY, Judges of the Panel. PER CURIAM.

The Panel previously transferred all actions in this litigation to the Northern District of California and, with the consent of that court, assigned them to the Honorable Ray McNichols, sitting by designation, for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407. In re IBM Peripheral EDP Devices Antitrust Litigation, 375 F.Supp. 1376 (J.P.M.L.1974); 394 F.Supp.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ex Parte CollettSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. In Re Plumbing Fixture CasesUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1968
  3. In Re IBM Peripheral EDP Devices Antitrust LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1974
  4. In Re IBM Peripheral Edp Devices Antitrust Lit.United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1975

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re Corrugated Container Antitrust Litigation-John W. CulyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
  2. In re Sunrise Securities LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1989
  3. In Re BURLINGTON NORTHERN, INC., PetitionerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
  4. In Re Uranium Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1980
  5. Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Rio Algom Ltd.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API