Legal Opinion

Copeland v. Black

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided January 30, 1959No. 6460PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LUJAN, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal from the District Court of Curry County dismissing claimant’s action, and holding that it was barred by the statute of limitations. No doubt the learned trial judge felt compelled by the legislative directive of 'Section 59-10-13 of 1953 Compilation to dismiss said cause of action because the claimant failed to prove that the employer, his supervisor or foreman had actual knowledge of the alleged accident and resulting injury; and, further, that claimant failed to give his employer written notice as provided by the above section, which reads as follows:

“*…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gonzales v. Chino Copper Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Stevenson v. Lee Moor Contracting Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Lipe v. BradburyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Ogletree v. JonesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Martin v. White Pine Lumber Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1930

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Lozano v. ArcherNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Montell v. OrndorffNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Geeslin v. Goodno, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Waymire v. Signal Oil Field Service, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
  5. State Ex Rel. Kermac Nuclear Fuels Corp. v. LarrazoloNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API