Dana v. Buckeye Coal & Coke Co.

The questions presented by this record are: 1. Did the power to appellant given by the Buckeye Coke & Coal Co. to hypothecate the bonds, authorize him to make a contract empowering the pledgee to sell the bonds at public or private sale without notice to the company? 2. Even if such power was included in the agency to hypothecate, was the sale under the circumstances fraudulent? 3. And could the appellant fake any greater rights from his alleged purchase and any greater interest in the bonds than would belong to a surety who pays a debt secured by collaterals in case no pretended sale of the…