People v. Marin
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Martin Marcus, J.
In People v Bartolomeo (53 NY2d 225 [1984]), the New York Court of Appeals announced that a person held in custody on *942one charge and represented by counsel on a pending and unrelated matter could not be questioned about the new charge in the absence of counsel. Six years later, in People v Bing (76 NY2d 331 [1990]), the Court abandoned this rule as unjustified and unworkable. Nonetheless, the law of this State —before and after Bing — is that a person may not be questioned in the absence of counsel about a charge "related” to a pending matter on which that…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People v. . MolineuxNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
- People v. RogersNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- People v. BingNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
- People v. BartolomeoNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- People v. VellaNew York Court of Appeals · 1967
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- People v. WrightNew York Supreme Court · 1997
- People v. MarinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995