Legal Opinion

People v. Marin

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 13, 1992PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Martin Marcus, J.

In People v Bartolomeo (53 NY2d 225 [1984]), the New York Court of Appeals announced that a person held in custody on *942one charge and represented by counsel on a pending and unrelated matter could not be questioned about the new charge in the absence of counsel. Six years later, in People v Bing (76 NY2d 331 [1990]), the Court abandoned this rule as unjustified and unworkable. Nonetheless, the law of this State —before and after Bing — is that a person may not be questioned in the absence of counsel about a charge "related” to a pending matter on which that…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. . MolineuxNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  2. People v. RogersNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. People v. BingNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. People v. BartolomeoNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. People v. VellaNew York Court of Appeals · 1967

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. WrightNew York Supreme Court · 1997
  2. People v. MarinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API