Legal Opinion

Harrell v. Mexico Cattle Co.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided April 30, 1889No. 6247PublishedCited by 48 opinions

Appeal from Mitchell. Tried below before Hon. Wm. Kennedy.

1Opinion of the Court

Gaines, Associate Justice.—

This was an original action brought by the appellee, a corporation, to set aside a judgment by default against it in a garnishment proceeding in which the appellant was plaintiff. Appellant on the 1st day of April, 1884, brought an action of debt in the District Court of Mitchell County against one Howell Brown, and on the same day caused to issue a writ of attachment against the property of the defendant, and also a writ of garnishment to appellee. The writ of garnishment was returned by the sheriff as executed on the same day it came to his hands “ by delivering…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Allen v. StephanusTexas Supreme Court · 1857

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Wilson v. DunnTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Richard M. Ross v. National Center for the Employment of the Disabled, as Successor in Interest to Access Healthsource, Inc., Assignee of O.R. BrookerTexas Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Focke, Wilkens & Lange & Scott v. Leon & BlumTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Investors Diversified Services, Inc. v. BrunerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1963
  5. Lamb-McAshan Co. v. EllisTexas Commission of Appeals · 1925

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API