Legal Opinion
United States v. Jules Huppert
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided November 20, 1990No. 89-5917PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CLARK, Circuit Judge:
Jules Huppert appeals his conviction and subsequent sentence imposed under the guidelines. Appellant claims that the district court abused its discretion by allowing irrelevant and prejudicial surplusage in the indictment and by admitting prejudicial evidence of certain allegedly extrinsic monetary transactions that were not directly related to appellant’s offense. Appellant requests a new trial. Appellant also claims that the district court erred by applying a cross-reference provision in the sentencing guidelines which allowed the court to sentence appellant as an…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. Orange Jell BeechumCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- Bollenbach v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- United States v. Paul Rowton BailleauxCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- United States v. Samuel ScrogginsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Clyde Alvin Williford, Sr., Clyde Alvin Williford, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- United States v. Richard O. BertoliCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- United States v. SchleiCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Rayful Edmond, IIICourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Frank Church, Carl Louis CoppolaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Connie Sue Heater, United States of America v. Harvey Bernard John, United States of America v. Timothy W. McCoyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.