Legal Opinion

Livezey v. Commissioner

United States Board of Tax Appeals

Decided March 12, 1929No. Docket No. 20440Published

STATE EMPLOYEE - COMPENSATION. - Petitioner held to be an employee of the State of West Virginia and his income from services performed for that State held to be exempt from Federal income tax.

1Opinion of the Court

F. M. LIVEZEY, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.

Livezey v. Commissioner

Docket No. 20440.

United States Board of Tax Appeals

15 B.T.A. 806; 1929 BTA LEXIS 2786;

March 12, 1929, Promulgated

STATE EMPLOYEE - COMPENSATION. - Petitioner held to be an employee of the State of West Virginia and his income from services performed for that State held to be exempt from Federal income tax.

F. M. Livezey, Esq., pro se.

J. E. Marshall, Esq., for the respondent.

MILLIKEN

The Commissioner determined a deficiency in income tax for the calendar year 1923 of $355.09. The petitioner filed his…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  2. Metcalf & Eddy v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. Gillespie v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  4. Duparquet Huot & Moneuse Co. v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  5. Louisville, Evansville & St. Louis Railroad v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1891

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API