Legal Opinion
In re Scinto
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided April 13, 2006No. 05-BG-430Published
1Per curiam
In this disciplinary proceeding against respondent Michael R. Scinto,1 the Board *231on Professional Responsibility (“Board”) has recommended to this court that a reciprocal, but not identical, sanction be imposed in the form of a public censure. No exceptions to the Board’s Report and Recommendation have been filed.
On September 9, 2004, the Supreme Court of New Jersey reprimanded respondent for disciplinary violations in which he stipulated to violating New Jersey Rule of Professional Conduct 8.4(c) (conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation).2 In re Michael R. Scinto, 181…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In Re DelaneyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
- In Re SpannDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
- In Re ChildressDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
- In Re BellDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
- In Re DreierDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.