Legal Opinion

State v. Gill

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 19, 1992No. 91-203PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.

The issue presented to this court is whether R.C. 2913.46(A) delegates state legislative authority to Congress, in violation of Section 1, Article II of the Ohio Constitution.1 For the reasons that follow, we find that R.C. 2913.46(A) does not violate Section 1, Article II of the Ohio Constitution.

*55R.C. 2913.46(A) provides:

“No individual shall knowingly possess, buy, sell, use, alter, accept, or transfer food stamp coupons in any manner not authorized by the ‘Food Stamp Act of 1977,’ 91 Stat. 958, 7 U.S.C. 2011, as amended.” (Emphasis added.)

Appellee contends that the language, “ * * * as…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Independent Community Bankers Ass'n of South Dakota v. State Ex Rel. MeierhenrySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  2. State ex rel. Swetland v. KinneyOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  3. City of Cleveland v. PiskuraOhio Supreme Court · 1945

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. State v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State v. DelvallieOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
  3. State v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  4. State v. Mason (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
  5. State v. Noling (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API