Stedman v. Cooper
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtBecker, J.
¶1 — This car accident case went through mandatory arbitration and trial de novo, both times resulting in a damage award for the plaintiff. We conclude the trial court did not abuse its discretion by excluding defense biomechanical testimony about the physical forces involved in the collision, and accordingly the defendant’s request for a new trial is denied. However, the court’s determination that the defendant failed to improve her position on trial de novo is inconsistent with the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Niccum v. Enquist, 175 Wn.2d 441, 286 P.3d 966 (2012). The award of…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Johnson v. MorrisWashington Supreme Court · 1976
- State v. YatesWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. YatesWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- Batten v. AbramsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1981
- Miller v. LikinsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Berryman v. MetcalfCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
- Johnston-Forbes v. MatsunagaWashington Supreme Court · 2014
- Gilmore v. Jefferson County Pub. Transp. Benefit AreaWashington Supreme Court · 2018
- Cooper v. ThompsonAlaska Supreme Court · 2015
- L.M. by and Through Dussault v. HamiltonWashington Supreme Court · 2019
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.