Legal Opinion

Dixon v. Producers Agriculture Insurance Co.

District Court, M.D. Tennessee

Decided July 28, 2016No. Case No. 2:14-cv-00034; Consolidated with: Case Nos. 2:14-cv-00035, 2:14-cv-00036PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

KEVIN H. SHARP, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Pending before the Court is Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket Entry No. 64). The motion has been fully briefed by the parties.1

RELEVANT FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

During the 2010 crop year, Plaintiffs were in the business of raising burley tobacco in Macon County, Tennessee.2 Defendant is an insurance company and is an Approved Insurance Provider (“AIP”), meaning that Defendant issues Multiple Peril Crop Insurance Policies (“MPCI Policies”) to farmers, which are reinsured by the Federal Crop Insurance Corporation (“FCIC”).…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Federal Crop Ins. Corp. v. MerrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  5. Hodges v. S.C. Toof & Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1992

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Vanderbilt Univ. v. Scholastic, Inc.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2019
  2. American Properties Co., G.P. v. The Welfont Group, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2023
  3. Flatiron Acquisition Vehicle, LLC v. CSE Mortgage LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2020
  4. Vanderbilt University v. Scholastic, Inc.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2021
  5. Vanessa Hill, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Ardent Health Services, et al.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API