United States v. Aikens
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
DuBOIS, District Judge.
Presently before the Court is the Motion of petitioner, Philip Aikens, to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (“Section 2255 Motion”). For the reasons set forth below, petitioner’s Section 2255 Motion will be denied.
I. BACKGROUND
On June 14, 2001, a federal grand jury sitting in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania returned a four-count Indictment charging petitioner, Philip Aikens, with theft of interstate shipment and aiding and abetting, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 659 and 2 (Count I); conspiracy to interfere with interstate…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- D'Amario v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2005
- United States v. WenzelDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2005
- Armstrong v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2005