United States v. Wenzel
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
McLAUGHLIN, District Judge.
Presently pending before this Court is a motion by Defendant Joseph C. Wenzel to set aside his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. 1 For the reasons set forth below, Wenzel’s motion will be denied.
I. BACKGROUND
In November of 1999, Rena “Tracy” Seyfert and Joseph C. Wenzel were named as defendants in a four-count indictment returned by a federal grand jury in Erie, Pennsylvania. Seyfert was charged with unlawful conversion of surplus federal government property in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 641 and attempting to persuade a witness to provide false…
2Cases cited72 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. PolishanDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2007
- Armstrong v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2005
- DeFrancesco v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2005
- Hukvari v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2005