Legal Opinion

United States v. Wenzel

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 2, 2005No. Civil Action No. 04-212 Erie, Criminal Action No. 99-33 EriePublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

McLAUGHLIN, District Judge.

Presently pending before this Court is a motion by Defendant Joseph C. Wenzel to set aside his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. 1 For the reasons set forth below, Wenzel’s motion will be denied.

I. BACKGROUND

In November of 1999, Rena “Tracy” Seyfert and Joseph C. Wenzel were named as defendants in a four-count indictment returned by a federal grand jury in Erie, Pennsylvania. Seyfert was charged with unlawful conversion of surplus federal government property in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 641 and attempting to persuade a witness to provide false…

2Cases cited72 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. PolishanDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2007
  2. Armstrong v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2005
  3. DeFrancesco v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2005
  4. Hukvari v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API