Legal Opinion
United States v. Charles S. Hammett
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 10, 2001No. 00-10065PublishedCited by 61 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TROTT, Circuit Judge:
This appeal concerns the district court’s order denying defendant Charles Hammett’s (“Hammett”) motion to suppress evidence obtained by the police during an allegedly illegal search of his home. Hammett was arrested for cultivating marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and § 841(b)(1)(A), after police seized 2430 marijuana plants and over three pounds of marijuana from Hammett’s residence. Hammett was convicted pursuant to a conditional guilty plea agreement. Hammett contends that the search warrant was invalid because it was premised on: (1) a partially false…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. PlaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Oliver v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Albert Douglas Davis v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- Estate Robert Smith v. MarascoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
- United States of America, State of California, Intervenor v. Raphyal Crawford, AKA Aarmyl CrawfordCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Donald Reyes, Robert JubicCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- ESTATE OFCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Perea-ReyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.