Legal Opinion
Wilson v. Taylor
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided December 14, 2006No. CIV.A. 05-399-JJFPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
FARNAN, District Judge.
Presently before the Court is Defendants’ Motion To Dismiss pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) with supporting memorandum (D.I.80, 81), Plaintiff James A. Wilson’s (“Plaintiff Wilson”) Motion To Amend (D.I.85), Defendants’ Motion To Strike Plaintiffs’ Sur-reply To Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (D.I.102), and Plaintiff Wilson’s Motion For Summary Judgment (D.I.103). For the reasons set forth below, the Court will deny Defendants’ Motion To Strike and grant in part and deny in part Plaintiffs’ Motion To Amend. The Court will grant Defendants’ Motion To…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hall v. CoupeCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2016
- International Business Machines Corporation v. Rakuten, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2022
- Perkins v. HeishmanDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2025