Legal Opinion

Sunbelt Savings, FSB v. Barr

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided October 23, 1991No. 05-90-01565-CVPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

OVARD, Justice.

The issue in this appeal is whether a summary judgment in favor of a guarantor on a note precludes suit, because of the doctrine of res judicata, against the individual for partnership liability on the underlying indebtedness. The trial court granted George J. Barr summary judgment. Sunbelt Savings, FSB, contends the trial court erred: (1) in granting Barr summary judgment; and (2) in denying Sunbelt’s motion for summary judgment on the indebtedness. We hold that the doctrine of res judicata does not apply to preclude the payee of a partnership note from suing a partner…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Gulbenkian v. PennTexas Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Jones v. StraussTexas Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Tobin v. GarciaTexas Supreme Court · 1958

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Barr v. Resolution Trust Corp. Ex Rel. Sunbelt Federal SavingsTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Ashcraft v. Lookadoo, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1997
  3. Ashcraft v. Lookadoo, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1997
  4. Ashcraft v. Lookadoo, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1997
  5. Hall CA-NV, LLC v. Robert Radovan and William Criswell, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2022

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API