Ashcraft v. Lookadoo
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)
1DissentWright, Justice
Because I would conclude in accordance with the Restatement of Suretyship and Guaranty that a guaranty, as a secondary obligation, follows the underlying note that it secures, I would conclude that Ashcraft by proving he was the owner and holder of the note, in the absence of evidence of an agreement to the contrary, also proved he was the owner and holder of the guaranty. Accordingly, I respectfully dissent from the majority opinion. Further, I would reverse the trial court’s judgment and render judgment in favor of Ashcraft.
The majority first concludes that according to the contract…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Coker v. CokerTexas Supreme Court · 1983
- Barr v. Resolution Trust Corp. Ex Rel. Sunbelt Federal SavingsTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- Jackson v. ThweattTexas Supreme Court · 1994
- Amberboy v. Societe De Banque PriveeTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- Dann v. Team Bank, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1990
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.