Legal Opinion

Woodruff v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided February 8, 1935No. A-8781PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdwards, J.

Plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted in the district court of Oklahoma county of receiving stolen property and was sentenced to serve a term of four years in the state penitentiary.

The information charges in substance that on a named date defendant received from Pat Thompson and Roy Clayton, for a consideration of $2, an overcoat, knowing at the time the same to have been stolen. Roy Clayton and Pat Thompson testified they burglarized the house of one R. W. Ward and stole the overcoat in question and sold it to defendant. To show guilty knowledge they testified that…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. White v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1923
  2. Wood v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1910
  3. Coffey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1927
  4. Buck v. TerritoryCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1909

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Fry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1950
  2. Gaddis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1968
  3. State v. BradySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  4. Ziegler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1980
  5. Bisanar v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1950

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API